| The Shadow and the Groundhog |
|
|
|
| Written by Massimo Lanzaro | |
| Tuesday, 21 October 2008 | |
|
Italian psychiatrist Massimo Lanzaro explores the concept of the shadow -- that part of us we fail to see or know -- in this review of Harold Ramis' film Groundhog Day.
THE SHADOW AND THE GROUNDHOG From a Jungian perspective, the persona is what we would like to be and how we wish to be seen by the world. It's our psychological clothing, and it mediates between our true selves and the environment, just as our physical clothing presents an image to those we meet. The ego is what we are and know about consciously. The self (itself an archetype) is alternately described as the "sum total of conscious and unconscious contents," a "coniunctio oppositorium," and as the "psychic totality of the individual." However, Jung's life and work were also preoccupied with the "dark side" of the psyche and of humanity. It is not that he felt that we should celebrate darkness in a satanic way or become devil worshippers. But he knew we should enter into darkness and find out what is inside it. Freud and Nietzsche also felt Western civilization had been celebrating and emphasizing the "light" for too long. Many religions have encouraged us to turn away from darkness. According to Jung, this has had a negative effect on the psyche and the body, and disturbed the related flow of energy. When civilization decides that the "dark is bad", and to be suppressed, the natural gradient of life might be altered. The term "dark side" has reached popular awareness trough the Star Wars series, and the films borrowed the term from Jung, through the influence of Jungian scholar Joseph Campbell on director George Lucas. Jung often referred to the dark side as "shadow", and he believed that not only individuals, but also whole nations, communities and groups had shadows that had to be encountered. He felt that the shadow has typically been demonized and "made evil," rather than viewed in a philosophical and more fair or equitable light. The shadow is a "dangerous peculiarity and a valuable and congenial asset as well" and contains not only the undesirable elements of life, but also the "dark springs of instinct and intuition," which mere reasonableness could never call awake. The Shadow is that part of us we fail to see or know, all that we would not want to be, and it is the sum of all those unpleasant parts of our personality that we prefer to keep well hidden, our baser, more primitive side. It is the inferior, dark, undifferentiated side, in conflict with the conscious Ego. The Shadow represents something inadequate and includes those qualities that clash with the established norms of social behaviour. Some Jungians have written about the gold in the shadow, believing that what consciousness rejects is often the stuff of life that may give it its highest value. The unconscious introduces new dimensions and might have a very different moral view compared to the one conditioned by society. The aim of this paper is to focus on the development of the archetype of the individual shadow throughout the psychological analysis of the main character of Groundhog Day, a film with Bill Murray and Andie MacDowell, directed by Harold Ramis and released in 1993. Phil (Bill Murray) is a weatherman for an American TV station, sent to Punxsatawney to cover the local Groundhog Day ceremony and all its accompanying festivities. The cynical weatherman accepts this trivial assignment with extremely bad grace and makes his way over to the town. Once he has made his report he returns to his hotel and goes to bed looking forward to getting away the following day. However, a surprise awaits him -- a second Groundhog Day, and then another! Living one day over and over again -- a dull, boring day with the same routine and that mindless little report on some country yokel ritual -- turns out to be the most special day of his whole life, a day when he can do all the things that every one of us has dreamed of: robbing a bank, blowing every last cent in Las Vegas or seducing the most beautiful woman in town. However, from a "deeper" point of view, it also slowly becomes a whole-making and thus holy important experience in his process of individuation and integration of the shadow features of his psyche. The legend of Groundhog Day is based on an old Scottish couplet: "If Candlemas Day is bright and clear, there'll be two winters in the year." Every February 2, people gather at Gobbler's Knob, a wooded knoll just outside of Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania. Residents contend that the groundhog has always been right. The ceremony in Punxsutawney was held in secret until 1966, and only Phil's prediction was revealed to the public. Since then, Phil's fearless forecast has been a national media event. The groundhog comes out of his electrically heated burrow, looks for his shadow and utters his prediction to a Groundhog Club representative in "groundhogese." The representative then translates the prediction for the general public. According to the tradition, at dawn on this day the groundhog comes out of his winter hibernation and, when he emerges from his lair, if he sees his shadow he goes back in because that means the winter is not over yet. Bearing this in mind, in my opinion the key shot of the movie is when we see the name of the groundhog (Phil!), carved in wood, appearing right above Phil Connors' head. It is hard to believe this is a mere coincidence, and not to think that it might have sprung from the depths of the director's own concept of the Shadow. For Phil, living the very same day over and over again will bring about Phil Connor's honouring and accepting ("seeing", as the Groundhog) his own shadow through a profound discipline. Moreover, this process will bring him love with the woman who has been with him all the time, and the "winter" of his heart and his soul is over.
Feb 1
Feb 2
Day 2
Day 3
Day 4 If the shadow is projected unconsciously onto another person, it generates enormous hostility (Phil is often labelled as a primadonna, his "persona"), the most unreasonable aversion and hatred. It may also provoke blind prejudice and racial persecution, since the shadowy presence that inhabits our unconscious is irrationally attributed to something "other" than us. Sometimes it is also possible to suffer this kind of projection, through bullying, or unjust and vitriolic personal attacks, for instance. Part of the job of the analyst is to identify such projections and uncover the repressed content associated with them.
Day 5
Day 6
Day 7 Inflating the Shadow implies extreme individualism, contempt for the needs of others, and a boastful claim to absolute uniqueness (when Phil responds to Rita's description of her ideal man by shouting "Me!" no less than four times).
Day 8
Day 9
Day 10
Day 11
Day 18
Day 19, 20, 21
Day 22 & 23
Day 24
Day 25
Day 26
Day 27
Day 28
Day 29
Day 30 Whilst exploring the Shadow, the goal is recognition rather than integration: accepting the negative and welcoming it as a pole of energy is less a true process of integration than a sort of coming to terms with the Shadow (just as the energy previously dispersed in the Shadow becomes exploitable by the Self), since eliminating it entirely appears an almost impossible enterprise. After all, for human beings to be complete they must, of necessity, have some deficiencies.
Day 31
Day 32
Day 33 Recognising the Shadow usually happens once the projections are recognised (this is what happens to Phil at this stage), whether we are the victims, for example of our own parents' unconscious projections, or we are projecting onto others. Jung defined this kind of introspection as "authentic confession" (for example, Phil's sincere words of love).
Day 34 It is probably our duty, whether as human beings or as therapists, to accept our own imperfections, sometimes admitting to them, sometimes confessing them both to ourselves and to others. This allows the energy imprisoned in the Shadow archetype to emerge and, in Phil's case, allows him to find a new strength, as he learns to play the piano and helps the dying homeless man. He also realises that omniscience is morally deficient as it allows no room for improvement. A standpoint outside of time and omniscience are not relevant to moral ends. It is not enough to be godlike and sometimes the company of gods is tedious. Humans are privileged in being able to improve themselves, and this is what makes them so interesting. It would seem that what is most intrinsically valuable is the journey that leads to Awareness, and that Awareness itself. Groundhog Day shows us a situation that does not appear in the repertoire of Classical tragedy. It tells the epic story of a god who becomes human and who discovers, after "seeing his shadow," that it is "better" to be human. Bibliography/Suggested Readings E.G. Humbert. C.G. Jung, The fundamentals of Theory and Practice. Chiron Publications, 1988 (Originally published in 1984 as C.G. Jung. Ed Universitaires, Paris). Cinema and Psyche - A Journal of Archetype and Culture - Spring 73 (the first issue of "Spring" devoted exclusively to film and depth psychology)
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|






















